GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
Session 2: REESI + C+ E Evaluation Framework: A Practical Guide to Contextualize and Implement a Robust Evaluation Design
The session had representatives from across various sectors who shared their experiences in integrating the RESSI+C+E evaluation framework into the evaluation processes in their organizations and had a fruitful discussion on practical application of this framework.
Firstly, Hon’ble Member provided a clear and comprehensive explanation of each criterion, drawing examples from agricultural economics. This undoubtedly enabled the audience to grasp practical insights into the REESI framework.
During his introductory remarks, Sh. Rahul from the OECD highlighted how the criteria serve as a global public good fostering critical thinking, embodying normative principles, and shifting the focus towards results rather than inputs and actions. Additionally, they aid in considering both the intended and unintended outcomes of interventions.
Dr. Gonzalo, representing UNICEF, underscored the significance of fundamental questions such as "what is the purpose and who benefits?" in adapting the criteria, citing examples from Mexico.
Dr. Shyam Singh (IRMA) shared his views on organically integrating the DAC criteria and way forward.
Sh. Senthil Rajan (Deloitte) gave us an user perspective on the evaluations.
Sh. Manas Puri (NDB) emphasized the importance of using the criteria to address the purpose of the evaluation and course correction.
Conclusion:
The session explored the significance of all seven criteria within the REESI + C+ E framework of OECD- DAC, using examples from various sectors such as environment, agriculture, employment, infrastructure development, and social interventions. Additionally, the panelists stressed the importance of integrating the 'Equity' criterion to evaluate the impact of government policies and interventions. They highlighted the necessity of conducting evaluations periodically to enable course correction in these policies and interventions. Furthermore, they emphasized the critical role of capacity development for evaluation, ensuring evaluations are contextually relevant. Selecting suitable evaluation methods based on available resources is essential, along with employing diverse tools to address specific criteria and needs, ensuring sustainability and cost-effectiveness. Each panelist offered valuable insights poised to enhance future evaluation practices. The session concluded positively, with engaging audience interaction and fruitful exchanges with the esteemed panelists.